To understand why WWI was initiated and eventually fought, we have to throw out the last 100 years of propaganda which many historical books have formed the basis of their stories on. A great deal of important information has been omitted from many history books about War and early onset propaganda campaigns has led many conclusions to become blurred in their explanation and have simply satisfied a false narrative from the start of an event by the alleged victors way of recalling terrible events & which in turn has successfully portrayed Britain’s involvement into patriotic acts and applauded heroism. Most mainstream successful books written about both world wars do not tackle the issue properly in understanding all political positions prior, the build up to War and the unseen influences of powerful groups that create the ideas in the first instance. I find it very interesting how even now the public can be persuaded to support acts of barbarism disguised as liberation and yet is all a result of heavy programming and the continued influence of the propaganda machine even today.
Britain and America take the gold in their capacity to manipulate an outcome and in the last 120 years have been experts at dis-information having successfully controlled the minds of most about the true events in all 20th Century war & conflict.
Slogans and charitable marketing campaigns have kept the illusion alive and well, every year since we celebrate and mourn the death of thousands of men so the cycle may continue to reflect in each subsequent generations minds, that we were saviours in the face of tyranny. We take part each year because we are programmed to do it and have been since the event itself, each and every generation of children taught to conform in schools across the land and buy into the red flowering symbol of an avoidable war that occurred 101 years ago today. Society is as malleable as soft clay, our emotional attachment upon events and the utilisation of trauma induced incidents is our Achilles heal, the easiest to manipulate and truly blurs our vision in understanding the way the world really works and not just how the media wants us to think how it works. Dare I say it but I will, every man in both World wars died in vain on all sides, there were very few heroes and not a single War was fought in defence of British soil. The notion that Britain was defending itself from foreign invaders threatening our national sovereignty is pure fiction and yet has become so popularised that the fiction has been upheld and become an obscure and grossly mis-interpreted story. To break down such a vast subject in a short article is next to impossible, yet I will provide source material below for those interested in further reading should you challenge yourself to read on. My personal position on War is one of utter disgust and I rarely entertain it, yet recently I have been forced to as my eldest daughter is receiving conditioning on the subjects at school.
Let us begin,
I wonder how many people know what the Carnegie Foundation is?
Foundations are powerful organisations that have influence over many avenues of control, these organisations are seldom reported on and are no conspiracy theory as we can see from the book below.
“ Lines of Credit: Ropes of Bondage The story of the financiers, their fellow conspirators and the plot to destroy Western Christian civilization. By Robert Goldsborough
unsurprisingly you will not find a copy of this book anywhere. Thankfully excerpts are read from its pages and can be found online. Here is a direct quote, yet the whole text can be better understood by watching the video link below:
“ the minutes revealed that in 1910 the Carnegie trustee’s asked themselves this question”,
“ Is there anyway known to man more effective than war to so alter the life of an entire people”?
“ Ultimately they concluded that war was the most effective way to change people”
These quotes are taken from the minutes recorded at the time by the Carnegie foundation and were then subsequently stored in a warehouse until 1953 where they were looked at by the individual researchers mentioned in the video link below.
We must come to realise as a nation that not everything is black and white and the stories popularised by state sponsored media is not the full picture at all. Foundations like these have spun intricate webs the world over and are the ultimate influencers yet are unseen by the stage show presented to society in the media networks, this continues to this day and the puppets we see on the tv are still advised and guided by those who wish to remain anonymous and ultimately unaccountable. So the minutes recorded by the Carnegie foundation were 9 years prior to WWI and remain largely unknown, yet understanding them is important to grasp the scale of collusion and the real motives behind War as social programming through traumatic events.
The Austrian Arch-Duke assassination is not an accurate explanation for the starting of a war and yet is one most allude to as the pre cursor for battle, this is nothing more than a ruse still fed into the minds a century later. There was however a documented offensive strategy being created by Britain in order to surround Germany and force them into battle. Now that’s something the public seldom hears.
Belgium was supposed to be founded on neutrality, one in which it was never to take sides in a war yet in November 1912 the Belgians were advised by the British Military that as soon as a European war broke out 160,000 men would be transported to Belgium with or without permission of the Belgian government. Detailed plans were being made against Germany by a neutral country, which seems to me they were not very neutral at all. Germany was quick to realise that it was surrounded by four hostile nations now, Russia, Austria-Hungry, France & Belgium.
I must point out here that Kaiser Willhelm II German King 1888-1918 had no intention of going to war and was acclaimed everywhere as a great peacemaker including the New York Times. In 25 years on the throne the Kaiser had fought no war and the German army had not fought in battle in nearly half a century. The Kaiser had bloodline links to the British Monarchy and had a deep attachment to Queen Victoria which was the German King’s grandmother!
A Royal Navy visit in July 1914 to Germany at Kiel Harbour showed the Kaiser’s love for the British Royal family by wearing a British admiral uniform for his inspection of the new Dreadnoughts. There are detailed articles and deep praise for the Kaiser’s capacity as a peacemaker long before war broke out and even up to the very last hours from the point of no return when finally his hand was forced.
Here enters the “ Man of the Century” Winston Churchill the first sea Lord in charge of the British Navy,
“ upon his own responsibility and against the express decision of the cabinet, ordered the mobilisation of the Naval reserve”. – Hugh Martin, Battle, The life story of the Rt Hon. Winston Churchill, 1937
The fleet was sent north bound up to Scapa flow directly opposite Germany in preparation for war. Upon order of Churchill himself and not the Prime Minister.
Late July 1914 the money man steps in and that infamous name crops up Lord Nathaniel Rothschild.
“ Lord Nathaniel Rothschild made an unscheduled visit to Prime minister Asquith to advise him on the preparations that his bank had put in place to prepare for war” – Hidden History
This was to supply a line of credit to Asquith as wars are an expensive endeavour, yet the kickbacks in interest repayments on borrowed money from private banking families is a profitable side affect in war times.
“ War….. What is it good for?”……… This of course all depends on your placing and role in the event itself. Private banking always wins big in war, it finances it, all sides involved.
“ By secretly committing Britain to war for France. Sir Edward Grey, Churchill and Prime minister Asquith left the Kaiser in the dark, unaware that a war with France meant war with the British Empire. Britain turned the European war of August 1st into a World war.
For Britain, World war 1 was not a war of necessity but a war of choice.”
– Patrick Buchanan, Churchill, Hitler and the unnecessary war
Germany had never threatened Britain and yet a decision was made to commit a country to war in an aggressive strategy. We were about to fight a country we had no quarrel with, What for? The entire cabinet apart from Edward Grey and Churchill were in favour of total neutrality. This is how democracy works. Its incredible to believe such hostility would be met from two nations that were so deeply connected and yet as we will find out, an insidious lust to crush Germany was growing in few men’s minds within British establishment and apparent foreign allies wanting the same conclusion for Germany.
24th July 1914 The Austrian and Serbian localised dispute over the Arch Duke escalated to an
ultimatum given to Serbia.
26th July Serbia accepts 9 out of 10 demands
27th July Austria declares war,
28th July Belgrade is shelled.
How utterly stupid Austria is at this point, 9 out of 10 demands accepted and bombing ensues. Russia backs one country and Germany the other although the dispute was a local conflict.
Kaiser continues his peacemaking efforts sending a telegram to the Czar.
“ I now receive authentic news of serious preparations for war on my Eastern frontier. In my endeavours to maintain peace of the world I have gone to the utmost limit possible. The responsibility for the disaster which is now threatening the whole civilised world will not be laid at my door. In this moment it still lies in your power to avert it. My friendship for you and your empire, transmitted to me by my grandfather on his deathbed has always been sacred to me and I have honestly often backed up Russia when she was in serious trouble especially in her last war. The peace in Europe may still be maintained by you, if Russia will agree to stop the military measures which must threaten Germany and Austro-Hungry”
– 30th July Kaiser telegrams Czar
The last German King Kaiser Wilhelm II had been backed into such a tight corner and the realisation that war was now inevitable must have been a great shame to those who thought they wielded the power to commit great change and prevent the atrocities of war itself.
He goes on to write,
“Frivolity and weakness are going to plunge the world into the most frightful war of which the ultimate object is the overthrow of Germany. For I no longer have any doubt that England, Russia and France have agreed among themselves – knowing that our treaty obligations compel us to support Austria – to use the Austro-Serb conflict as a pretext for waging a war of annihilation against us… In this way the stupidity and clumsiness of our ally [Austria] is turned into a noose. So the celebrated encirclement of Germany has finally become an accepted fact… The net has suddenly been closed over our heads, and the purely anti-German policy which England has been scornfully pursuing all over the world has won the most spectacular victory which we have proved ourselves powerless to prevent while they, having got us despite our struggles all alone into the net through our loyalty to Austria, proceed to throttle our political and economic existence. A magnificent achievement, which even those for whom it means disaster are bound to admire. – Kaiser Wilhelm’s diary 30-31st July 1914
“August 1st– 2nd All Cabinet members except Edward Grey and Winston Churchill are pro-British neutrality
2nd Edward Grey gives France the assurance of war support. French planes fly over Belgium.
German govt. issue warning to Belgium over neutrality violation
4th Germany invades Belgium, Uk declares war on Germany and
then cuts the trans-Atlantic telephone cables from Germany
6th 200,000 of British expeditionary force to France”
-Nick Kollerstrom, How Britain initiated both world wars
On Germany, Kollerstrom goes on further to state “ It was a defensive plan, the only one they had. So, going into Belgium was Germany’s defensive war plan.”
It’s also important to understand that, “ Germany was the last of the continental powers to take that irrevocable step [ of mobilisation ]”
– Hidden History
A heinous and strategic plan to force Germany into war was executed with skill and resulted in the deaths of over 16million people. A century later and we are still succumbing to the propaganda campaigns that are mis-leading us all, its not our fault as we have all been subject to the lies sold as truths in Britain from an early age and passed down each subsequent generation all so we can conform to the habitual programming and without question to follow the script for a lifetime.
The act of remembering an event so traumatic to millions of people world wide is to never commit the same actions ever again and yet as we have seen since WWI Britain has maintained the correct environment for a disease to thrive in it’s foreign policies. Governments strategies as a country and meddling in other nations business does not reflect the true nature of human attitudes in wider society, we become all to easily hypnotised by clever propaganda techniques that are so slick in their use of the media that hardly anybody notices. We are drawn into motivation for war by repetitive exposure to the media and the stories they spin. We are so distracted individually and collectively that few see the trick performed right in front of our eyes, still the tricks and deceptions carry on, remember Blair and Iraq? Same format different decade.
“ The indelible memory of atrocity stories that had taken place only in the imaginations of British propaganda agents proved to be stronger and more persistent than any facts.This curious discovery, the power of myths over facts, was the real legacy of the first world war”
– Richard Milton, Best of Enemies
Myths over facts continues today unabated, it is the cancer of our language. Myths have been successfully seeded into our society by combining belief and fear alongside it to create incredible levels of almost comatose intellectual laziness. Much of society has been purposefully created this way with no thanks to government control. Historical events and a great deal of history in general did not happen the way we are told. I find it astonishing that Winston Churchill received anything other than a lengthy prison sentence, what an absolute joke that this warmongering bastard was awarded the highest accolade of the 20th Century. What Churchill committed to especially after being crowned Prime minister in 1940 was far worse than any reprisal from Adolf Hitler. And yet to say this or even postulate the true actions of both these individuals can render the writer an outright heretic and wind up incarcerated for questioning the official yet fictional narrative.
I understand how those who may read this could be upset or enraged by my findings yet directing the anger toward the writer is unnecessary and should be really channelled into discovering for ourselves the true nature of this reality and hold the government accountable so we may all dispel the continued deceptions and disrespect we pay to all those fallen in avoidable wars.
There are no winners in war that is an illusion, only loss and destruction at the hands of puppeteers and their stage show puppets. The endless glorification of war in film and feeble history writing which always supports Britain’s actions has always proved successful in programming the minds of society, MK Ultra programs may have started in the 50’s yet are alive and well today still conditioning those who wilfully refuse to think for themselves. It does not have to be this way.
Below I have included all my sources for anybody to look at in their own time.
How Britain initiated both world wars- Nick Kollerstrom
Best of Enemies: Britain and Germany – 100 Years of Truth and Lies
The Karma of Untruthfulness: v. 1: Secret Socieities, the Media, and Preparations for the Great War: Secret Societies, the Media, and Preparations for the Great War
Truth and the war- E.D. Morel
Nothing more effective than war for changing people, Carnegie foundation video
Churchill, Hitler, and “The Unnecessary War”: How Britain Lost Its Empire and the West Lost the World- Patrick J. Buchanan